![]() |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
1714 Mexico Escudos with "J" in the date: the 17J4 one escudo & the J714 two escudos
Directly below is a dated 1714 Mexico one escudo from the 1715 Fleet. Everything about it looks normal except the third digit of the date seems clearly to be the letter "J", not the digit 1. "J" is the initial of the assayer for 1714 Mexico City gold, Jose Eustaquio de Leon. Did Mexican die cutters confuse a punch for the letter J with a punch for the digit 1? But they had just used the correct punch for the first digit of the date. Presumably it was still at hand! It has been suggested that the third digit/letter is in fact a 1, with the bottom right serif broken off. Possibly, but...notice the diagonal flow lines running uninterrupted across the fields just below the "J". Nothing broke off or clogged up after the the "17J4 " date was pressed into the die. Perhaps then the punch for the digit 1 was defective? But wait, look at the first 1 in the date. It is not defective, and it also seems to be of a different style than the "J" punch. If the "J" is from a broken 1 punch, it is not the same punch as was used for the first digit in the date moments before. How odd!
Next we have a Mexico City 1714 two escudos also from the 1715 Fleet. I apologize for the quality of the scan but that is all that is currently available. In this case the first digit resembles an inverted "J". There is no suggestion that this is from a digit 1 punch with broken serifs. A circular loop of raised metal arcs left from the vertical stroke of the letter/digit. This loop seems a little wide for a typical Mexico City "J", but all the digits and letters in this part of the legends are stretched and somewhat distorted. Look at the G and the 7. It is very hard to render a definitive verdict here. It is possible that we have various striking problems in the legend that work together to create what happens to look like an inverted "J". Or maybe a "J" punch was mistaken used for the first digit of the date.
480-595-1293
|
|